Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hovering at Death's Door"
Thecomicman (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Danble: [points to a scar on chest] Mary Ellen Moffat. She broke my heart. | Danble: [points to a scar on chest] Mary Ellen Moffat. She broke my heart. | ||
| + | |||
| + | tcm: characters who perform strenuous actions while at negative don't just take damage, they take permanent damage, right? | ||
Revision as of 13:13, 24 December 2006
Noah: It is my understanding that characters failing the "heart-explosion roll" do not receive a modified CON check, they are automatically unconscious and bleeding out.
Also, there are a number of activities that can be defined as non-strenuous, most of which are intuitive (all, of course, subject to DM discretion). One that may *not* be intuitive, however, is that character classes with the hide-in-shadows ability may do so at no penalty while at a negative. This is fortunate, because that is just exactly what characters knocked down to a negative typically feel like doing.
Danble: Permenent scaring at -7? Well golly, I was there last night. Do I lose charisma or something?
Noah: Nah. Actually, chicks dig the scars. It's just something to recollect when sitting around the fire at the inn, comparing war stories with grizzled veterans.
Danble: [points to a scar on chest] Mary Ellen Moffat. She broke my heart.
tcm: characters who perform strenuous actions while at negative don't just take damage, they take permanent damage, right?
